Payne, Ed. Police: We failed to get Freddie Gray timely medical care after arrest. 2015 Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. cnn.com. April 4 25, 2015.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QY9rpdVYOE. web
The city of Baltimore is under a huge turmoil as many people are angry over the death of Freddie Gray, which is another death that involves a white police killing/injuring a black man during an arrest. I used injure here because Freddie Gray was injured during his arrest but died later in the coma due to the officer's refusal to provide him with medical aid. On April 12, several white policemen arrested Freddie Gray in a foot chase breaking his neck and possibly damaging his spinal cord which lead him into a coma. Gray died one week after his arrest. What many people in Baltimore are angry about is that Freddie Gray asked the cops for medical attention multiple times and he did not receive any. Police commissioner, Anthony Batts admitted that the police did not give him medical attention in a timely manner. Some people see this act as murder and are protesting heavily in the streets of Baltimore, vandalizing stores and destroying police cars in the process. Six police officers are involved in this current arrest and may face charges of murder or manslaughter. This is another event that is seen to be racist as a white cop kills a black person for no good reason which is causing a huge stir in America.
This is one of the many cases that involves a white cop killing a black man that is similar to the death of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and Walter Scott. What I’m curious is that would this case cause the same amount of hype if it involved a victim that was not black? I feel like the technology plays a huge role in this controversy of white cops killing black men in “cold blood”. With every cop is equipped with a camera and almost every witness has a cellphone, thus an arrest can easily be captured and uploaded on the internet for people see. A lot of videos of cops arresting black men are violent and horrifying which make people assume that cops are evil. The arrest all began when Freddie Gray ran after seeing the cops and the police chased after him under suspicion. Yes the police did have the right to arrest him under suspicion, but I feel like his arrest wasn’t necessary. Freddie Gray did nothing illegal or provoke the police that would justify his arrest. I hope that the tension between the police and the people of Baltimore eases as we wait for answer from Gray’s autopsy. Vergano, Dan. Ghorayshi, Azeen. Chinese Study Of Human Embryos Raises Fears Of Designer Babies.BuzzFeedNews. April 22, 2015. http://www.buzzfeed.com/danvergano/chinese-study-of-human-embryos-raises-fears-of-designer-babi. Web
An experiment was conducted in China which involved the genetic engineering of the human embryo for the first time in history. This experiment which was first reported by the Nature News on April 22 was unsuccessful with only 7 out of 86 embryos surviving the engineering process. The experiment which was sponsored by the Chinese government drew criticisms, both positive and negative from scientists around the world. Some condemned the experiment to be ethically wrong and said the technology used in this experiment was obsolete. Others such as Paul Knoepfler praised the experiment for the use of technology which is becoming more ubiquitous in the field of science. The main technology used to alter the DNA in the embryos is called CRISPR/Cas9 which was invented by Jennifer Doudna and her colleagues. Although many American scientists frowned at the Chinese experiment, researchers in America are pursuing the research of genetically engineered animals.CRISPR can be used to create animals that are resistant to disease or “humanize” pigs so that their organs can be used in transplant. Due to the bad results, the experiment has been called to the halt but scientists hope to continue for the sake of science.
Recombinant DNA Technology has been a hot topic of debate, which can be seen in GMO products. Should we humans wield the technology to alter DNA which would make the whole process of evolution be pointless? The theory proposed by Charles Darwin in the nineteenth century states that life has been evolving through naturals selection for eons but now, with Recombinant DNA Technology, we humans can now practically skip this entire process of evolution. I feel like this technology usage should be limited, especially on humans. Since this technology has already been used on animals and plants, we should continue our development and research. However when this technology is used on humans, I feel that we are almost playing God and we are wielding a power that is almost omnipotent. There are also moral the ethical issues that arise when this technology is used on humans. As seen in the experiment, 79 human embryos died in this experiment; 79 human lives were lost. Is it worth it to kill human embryos for the sake of science?
Sutter, John. Climate: 7 questions on 2 degrees. 2015 Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. cnn.com. April 25, 2015. http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/24/opinions/sutter-questions-two-degrees-climate/index.html. Web
2 degrees Celsius. That's the temperature that stands between the current world and global catastrophe. An article, released on April 24 shows some of the possible repercussions the world will face if it continues to pollute the environment. 2 degrees Celsius seems like a small temperature change but this small number carries a huge importance that can change of course of mankind. A research from the National Research Concluded that the increase of the global temperature by 2 degrees Celsius would lead to detrimental effects such as increased size of wildfire, hurricanes becoming more intense, the Arctic losing 30% of its ice, and the availability of ice water declining by 20%. This disaster can be avoided if the world cuts down their greenhouse gas emissions by 90% which is possible but difficult. The global direct of the World Resource Institute said that the world will significantly decrease the risk if the world focuses on using clean energy. If the world continues to pollute and the global temperature increases over 2 degrees Celsius, the world faces major extinction and reconfiguration of the coastline.
The world recently celebrated Earth Day which was created to draw public awareness of pollution. In the 21st century, the world is beginning to see the damages being down onto the environment which began during the industrialization era. I feel like the world will have a hard time cutting their greenhouse gas emission due to our reliance on fossil fuel. In order for us to decrease of gas emission, we need an alternative clean energy, which exists today but are not ubiquitous. The world is already seeing the increased effects of pollution such as the drought in California and the ice melting in the Arctic. Despite our current effort to reduce pollution, I feel like this isn't enough to prevent us from reaching the increase of global temperature. The UN and other world organizations should order their members decrease their pollution and impose fines on countries that don't comply.